Corrections and sources
Send the URL, affected provision and authoritative source so the record can be reviewed.
hello@holisticai.com →Contact
Get in touch about source corrections, research partnerships, technical issues or the EU AI Act assessment tool.
Send the URL, affected provision and authoritative source so the record can be reviewed.
hello@holisticai.com →Share a use case, unexpected classification or report issue without including confidential information.
hello@holisticai.com →For research, education and implementation partnerships.
rahul.patel@holisticai.com →Corrections, sources and feedback on the tools go to hello@holisticai.com. Research, education and implementation partnerships go to rahul.patel@holisticai.com.
Corrections first. If a provision reads wrong against EUR-Lex, a date is stale, a link is broken or a guide states something the Regulation does not, that is the most valuable message you can send: please include the page and, if you can, the source you checked against. Corrections take priority over everything else.
Beyond that: questions about a source or a citation, the risk classifier and what it does or does not assess, the AI Literacy Program, and requests for the compliance checklist as a working document.
We cannot tell you whether a specific system is high-risk, whether a carve-out applies to you, or whether your documentation would satisfy a particular authority. Those turn on facts about your system and on guidance that is still developing, and they need advisers who can see the facts. What we can do is point you at the provisions that decide the question and explain what they require.
The authentic legal text is on EUR-Lex, and Commission guidance, codes of practice and consultations come from the European AI Office. Enforcement questions go to the market surveillance authority designated by your Member State under Article 70, this site is an independent resource and cannot act for or on behalf of any authority.